Increasing Supply Chain Flexibility and
Cost Effectiveness
In today's supply chain and logistics
systems, it is crucial to consider customers' specific needs. Different markets
have different priorities, with some being driven primarily by cost and others
by the quality of products or services.
For cost-driven markets, the focus is on
minimising expenses while ensuring the quality of a specific product or
service. On the other hand, quality-driven markets prioritise the excellence of
the products or services, with costs being a secondary concern.
One crucial aspect to consider is space.
Manufacturing facilities are often located away from the areas where the final
product is consumed. This spatial separation necessitates efficient
transportation and distribution networks to ensure products promptly reach
their destinations. By optimising space utilisation, organisations can minimise
costs and maximise efficiency in their supply chain operations.
Another key consideration is time.
Organisations rely on inventory management to bridge the gap between supply and
demand. By strategically managing inventory levels, organisations can
manufacture products at the lowest possible cost and take advantage of reduced
transportation expenses.
This is achieved by consolidating
finished goods into larger shipments, thereby increasing the utilisation of
transportation facilities. Organisations can optimise their supply chain
processes by effectively managing time and enhancing overall operational
efficiency.
The Benefits of Outsourcing Supply Chain
Operations
Historically, major manufacturing
organisations like Ford and Unilever operated with vertically integrated supply
chains, where the parent company owned most suppliers, service providers, and
associated facilities.
It was believed that this approach
provided complete control over quality and costs. However, as time has
progressed and markets have become more diverse, meeting the demands of these
varied markets has become increasingly challenging. The slow pace of change
management in large corporate organisations has often hindered market
innovation, sales, and profitability.
Recently, there has been a shift towards
outsourcing functions that are traditionally considered internal areas of
expertise. Rising costs and advancements in IT and ERP systems have driven this
change.
As a result, organisations are now
questioning whether logistics, once seen as a core area of expertise, should
still be managed internally. This shift reflects a growing recognition that
external partners may possess specialised knowledge and resources that can
enhance efficiency and effectiveness in the supply chain.
The decision to outsource certain
functions has its challenges. While it may offer potential benefits such as
cost savings and access to specialised expertise, it also introduces new risks
and complexities.
Organisations must carefully evaluate
the trade-offs and consider factors such as the impact on quality control,
customer satisfaction, and overall supply chain visibility. The goal is to
balance maintaining control over critical aspects of the supply chain while
leveraging external capabilities to drive innovation and meet the evolving
needs of diverse markets.
Many organisations focus on enhancing
their product or service portfolio, leading them to outsource their logistics
functions to third-party logistics (3PL) providers. Outsourcing logistics can
include any combination of these tasks:
- Inbound logistics.
- Outbound logistics or distribution.
- Warehousing.
- Inventory management.
- Sales Order Processing (SOP).
- Purchase Order Processing (POP).
- Returns logistics.
- Marketing services requirements.
- IT Services (SOP, POP, MRP I & II and Inventory
Management).
- Credit collection of sales invoices (Factoring).
By leveraging the operational
efficiencies of these 3PL operators, organisations can achieve a superior level
of service while simultaneously cutting costs through economies of scale,
minimising their overall logistics costs.
Degrees of Logistics Outsourcing
Fully integrated logistics is referred
to as 5PL, whilst partial integration is called 3PL. The outsourcing of
logistics can have the following meanings:
- 1PL - First-Party Logistics: First-party logistics refers to
an organisation that owns its shipment and freight and can move goods and
products from one location to another. They function as the shipper of
myriad items and coordinate the delivery of goods to their intended
locations. This arrangement primarily benefits the producer or supplier
and the purchaser. There are no intermediaries participating in the entire
operation.
- 2PL - Second-Party Logistics: The 2PL logistics model involves
an organisation subcontracting a carrier or warehouse manager to manage
the operational execution of a specific transportation or logistics task.
However, an organisation retains the responsibility for organising and overseeing
the process. In this model, the relationship between the organisation and
the 2PL service provider is typically focused on cost and short-term
objectives, with the 2PL service provider following the organisation's
instructions and receiving payment accordingly.
- 3PL - Third-Party Logistics: In a 3PL model, an organisation
maintains management control while delegating transport and logistics
operations to an external supplier who may further subcontract the tasks.
A 3PL provider offers a valuable service that allows an organisation to
concentrate on other business aspects by overseeing the outsourcing of
operational logistics, ranging from warehousing to delivery. 3PL providers
offer various supply chain logistics services, such as transportation,
warehousing, picking, packing, inventory forecasting, order fulfilment,
packaging, and freight forwarding. Given these factors, it is evident that
3PL service providers play a crucial role in ensuring the efficient
operation of an organisation.
- 4PL - Fourth-Party Logistics: In the 4PL model, an organisation
delegates the management of logistics activities and their implementation
across the entire supply chain to external parties. The 4PL service
involves more than just outsourcing the coordination of logistical tasks
to third parties. It also includes the management of these tasks. 4PL
service providers oversee the supply chain, while other parties often
delegate administrative and operational activities. These providers
usually do not own transportation or warehouse assets, operating as
non-asset-based logistics entities. The role of a 4PL logistic provider
requires an elevated level of involvement in the organisation's business
activities. In addition to outsourcing logistics processes, an
organisation expects the service provider to monitor them. Instead of
short-term collaboration agreements based solely on cost considerations,
the focus shifts to long-term partnerships that prioritise service quality
and involve shared risks and benefits. A 4PL service provider acts as a
supply chain integrator, bringing together and managing all the resources,
capabilities, and technology required for an organisation's supply chain,
including its network of providers.
- 5PL - Fifth-Party logistics: 5PL logistics services can
strengthen demand. Furthermore, a 5PL service provider engages in rate
negotiations with various other service providers, including trucks and
airlines. A 5PL operator is a logistics service provider that effectively
plans, organises, and executes logistics solutions for different
commercial organisations. The 5PL service provider can fortify demand by
negotiating rates with other service providers, like trucks, airlines,
etc. Organisations that delegate logistics management functions to
external parties are a prime example of this solution. The concept of 5PL
has gained significant attention recently, particularly with the rise of
e-commerce. In addition to integrating and managing the supply chain, 5PL
organisations offer other valuable services such as call centres and
online payment systems.
Critics of outsourcing logistics to a 3PL, 4PL or 5PL service operator often need clarification on whether the promised cost savings are achieved. They argue that the need for more control over the logistics process is a significant reason organisations should not opt for outsourcing. In the logistics industry, larger organisations manage their logistics needs internally. In comparison, smaller and medium organisations are more inclined to outsource to cut costs.
Outsourcing some or all aspects of logistics can give organisations access to the expertise, knowledge, and experience of third-party service providers. This can result in cost reductions while improving service levels beyond what the organisation could achieve. Additionally, cash flow may see a positive impact as logistics service providers typically charge based on the number of consignments, ensuring they cover their costs and make a reasonable profit.
The decision to outsource logistics functions should be carefully considered
based on each organisation's specific needs and circumstances. While there are
valid concerns about control and cost savings, outsourcing can offer valuable
benefits regarding expertise and service quality. Organisations can determine
the best approach to managing their logistics operations effectively by
weighing the pros and cons.
Additional articles can be found at Procurement Made Easy. This site looks at procurement issues to assist organisations and people in increasing the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their product and service supply to the customers' delight. ©️ Procurement Made Easy. All rights reserved.