The
work environment within organisational management is dynamic and stressful.
Conflict can be expected when two or more stakeholders have different opinions
or interests. It can occur, and team managers can spend much time managing it
and the resultant fallout. Conflicts happen for many reasons, such as schedule
priorities, scarce resources, political or technical reasons, and personal
issues.
Conflict
resolution can build trust and sometimes bring new ideas and opportunities if
appropriately managed. Proper conflict resolution can differentiate between
positive and negative outcomes, and an incorrect solution can negatively affect
an organisation.
If
a team manager fails to resolve conflicts effectively, their team Members will
lose trust in them and each other, weakening the team's ability to work
together and detracting from an organisation’s success. A team manager must
deal with conflict before it is beyond repair. The following are a few
consequences of improper conflict resolution:
- Low
team morale.
- Negative
impact on the team manager’s authority.
- Increased
number of personal clashes.
- Low
productivity and efficiency.
- Low-quality
work.
A
team manager must often monitor and resolve conflicts quickly to prevent them
from becoming significant. There are typically five conflict resolution
techniques, amongst others:
- Withdraw/Avoid.
- Smooth/Accommodate.
- Compromise/Reconcile.
- Force/Direct.
- Collaborate/Problem
Solve.
To
discuss each technique in more detail:
Withdraw or Avoid: In this conflict resolution technique, a team manager can
avoid the conflict or retreat and allow it to resolve itself. This technique is
beneficial when the stakes are low and the conflict will likely disappear, and
can be used in the following cases:
- Individuals
involved in the conflict are not significant stakeholders.
- The
issue can be a manageable time investment.
- An
intense argument has already happened, and individuals need time to cool
off.
- If
the team manager does not have enough information to use other techniques.
This
technique saves time that a team manager can invest in other productive
activities. It is an excellent approach to apply to low-level conflicts, giving
the team manager enough time to prepare if the conflict re-emerges.
However,
withdrawing from or avoiding a conflict may weaken the team manager's position
because parties may assume that the team manager has an unfair bias and lacks
the skills and authority to deal with disputes.
The
main issue with this conflict resolution technique is that it could be argued
that it is not a dispute management technique because it avoids conflict when
it arises. A team manager needs to act quickly to avoid the negative impacts of
disputes and arguments.
Smooth or Accommodate: This technique deals with finding
areas of agreement, tries to smooth the situation, and circumvents challenging
discussions. In smoothing, a team manager gives more consideration to one party
than the other.
The
team manager tries to downplay the seriousness of the situation and behaves as
if the problem never existed. This technique is helpful in the following cases:
- More
time is needed to deal with the conflict.
- When
a temporary solution to the problem is required.
- If
the conflict is minor and involves less influential stakeholders.
This
technique requires little effort. A team manager can focus on essential issues
while ignoring unimportant arguments. The situation can be handled simply while
bringing harmony, creating goodwill, and providing enough time to find a
permanent solution.
Suppose
a team manager needs to bring a balanced approach to smoothing. In that case,
one party may take advantage of the situation since the team manager is giving
them more consideration, and members of the party not being accommodated may
question the team manager's authority or stop reporting conflicts. This
technique is not recommended as it often weakens the team manager’s control.
Compromise or Reconcile: A team manager takes suggestions from
both sides and tries to partially satisfy both parties. This technique is valid
when the stakeholders involved in the conflict hold equal power. A team manager
may use this technique in the following cases:
- All
parties involved in the conflict need to win.
- When
the team manager has an equal relationship with both parties.
- Collaborative
and forcing techniques have yet to work.
- When
a team manager needs a temporary solution to move forward quickly.
This
technique brings quick results, lowers stress, and keeps all parties placated
until a permanent solution is found. A team manager can solve a conflict and
gain enough time to find a better solution. However, this technique only
generates trust in the short run.
All
parties remain unsatisfied, and the conflict could resurface at any time.
Morale is not being built. The team manager may be required to intervene sooner
to ensure all parties abide by the agreement.
Force or Direct: A team manager agrees with one party’s viewpoint and
enforces their wishes. This is a win-lose situation and risks demoralising the
team. This conflict-resolution technique can be used in the following cases:
- When
a team manager needs a quick solution.
- Where
it is easy to define when one party is correct and the other is incorrect.
- When
the stakeholders on the conflict's losing side are unimportant.
- If
the relationship with those stakeholders is not essential.
This
technique provides a quick solution to the problem. It requires almost no
effort from the team manager and may help establish the team manager’s
authority. However, using this technique may leave a negative impression on the
team manager and result in opportunities lost from the opposing party's
viewpoint. A team manager must refrain from applying this technique with
high-power stakeholders, as sometimes it may backfire and worsen the conflict.
Collaborate or Problem Solve: In this technique, a team manager
discusses the issue with all parties to agree on a solution while considering
multiple viewpoints. The team manager may use this technique in the following
cases:
- When
a team manager wants to incorporate multiple views.
- If
the people involved in the conflict are influential.
- When
a consensus is required.
- If
the team manager wants to distribute responsibility equally to all
parties.
This
fundamental problem-solving technique gives a final solution to the conflict.
It brings consensus, commitment, and shared responsibility for the outcome.
This technique creates a win-win situation as it builds confidence in the team,
earns respect, and establishes authority.
A
team manager cannot use this technique with all conflicts when they need a
quick solution because it takes time and effort. It is generally used for
disputes which may severely affect an organisation.
Conflicts exist throughout an organisation as people battle to find solutions
to arguments, disputes, or differences of opinion. They can occur as people
struggle to find their place within a team, for political reasons or because of
a genuine difference of opinion based on their knowledge surrounding the
dispute at the time it occurs.
People
involved in disputes become fixated on winning the battle, come what may,
leading to wasted time and effort that could be more effectively used to
achieve the organisation's aims and objectives. Dispute resolution skills can
be used to great effect to reduce this impact on organisational
cohesiveness.
How
and when differences of opinion are settled affect the morale of the rest of
the organisation and the reputation of the team manager within whose area the
dispute occurs. The key is to resolve the dispute as quickly as possible to the
satisfaction of all concerned and prevent it from affecting organisational
efficiency and effectiveness.
Additional articles can be found at Procurement Made Easy. This site looks at procurement issues to assist organisations and people in increasing the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their product and service supply to the customers' delight. ©️ Procurement Made Easy. All rights reserved.