Within organisational management, the
work environment is dynamic and stressful. Conflict can be expected when two or
more stakeholders have different opinions or interests. They can occur, and team
managers can spend much time managing them and the resultant fallout. They
happen for many reasons, such as schedule priorities, scarce resources, political
or technical reasons, and personal issues.
Conflict resolution can build trust and
sometimes bring new ideas and opportunities if appropriately managed. Proper
conflict resolution can differentiate between positive and negative outcomes,
and an incorrect solution can negatively affect an organisation.
If a team manager fails to resolve
conflicts effectively, their team Members will lose trust in them and each
other, weakening the team's ability to work together and detracting from an organisation’s
success. A team manager must deal with conflict before it is beyond repair. The
following are a few consequences of improper conflict resolution:
- Negative impact on the
team manager’s authority.
- Increased number of personal
clashes.
- Low productivity and
efficiency.
A team manager must often monitor and
resolve conflicts quickly to prevent them from becoming significant. There are
typically five conflict resolution techniques, amongst others:
- Collaborate/Problem
Solve.
To discuss each technique in more detail:
Withdraw or Avoid: In this conflict resolution technique, a team manager can avoid
the conflict or retreat and allow it to resolve itself. This technique is
beneficial when low stakes and the conflict will likely disappear, and can be
used in the following cases:
- Individuals
involved in the conflict are not significant stakeholders.
- The issue
can be a manageable time investment.
- An intense
argument has already happened, and individuals need time to cool off.
- If the team manager
does not have enough information to use other techniques.
This technique saves time that a team manager
can invest in other productive activities. It is an excellent approach to apply
to low-level conflicts. It gives the team manager enough time to prepare if the
conflict re-emerges.
However, withdrawing from or avoiding a
conflict may weaken the team manager's position because parties may assume that
the team manager has an unfair bias and lacks the skills and authority to deal
with disputes.
The main issue with this conflict
resolution technique is that it could be argued that it is not a dispute
management technique because when the conflict arises, it is avoided. A team manager
needs to act quickly to avoid the negative impacts of disputes and arguments.
Smooth or Accommodate: This technique deals with finding areas of agreement and tries to
smooth the situation and circumvent challenging discussions. In smoothing, a team
manager gives more consideration to one party than the other.
The team manager tries to downplay the
seriousness of the situation and behaves as if the problem never existed. This
technique is helpful in the following cases:
- More time is
needed to deal with the conflict.
- When a
temporary solution to the problem is required.
- If the conflict is
minor and involves less influential stakeholders.
This technique requires little effort. A team
manager can focus on essential issues while ignoring unimportant arguments. The
situation can be handled simply while bringing harmony, creating goodwill, and
providing enough time to find a permanent solution.
Suppose a team manager needs to bring a
balanced approach to smoothing. In that case, one party may take advantage of
the situation since the team manager is giving them more consideration, and
members of the party not being accommodated may question the team manager's
authority or stop reporting conflicts. This technique is not recommended as it
often weakens the team manager’s control.
Compromise or Reconcile: A team manager takes suggestions from both sides and tries to
satisfy both parties partially. This technique is valid when the stakeholders
involved in the conflict hold equal power. A team manager may use this
technique in the following cases:
- All
parties involved in the conflict need to win.
- When the team
manager has an equal relationship with both parties.
- Collaborative
and forcing techniques have yet to work.
- When a team manager
needs a temporary solution to move forward quickly.
This technique brings quick results,
lowers stress, and keeps all parties placated until a permanent solution is
found. A team manager can solve a conflict and gain enough time to find a
better solution. However, this technique only generates trust in the short run.
All parties remain unsatisfied, and the
conflict could resurface at any time. Morale is not being built. The team manager
may be required to interfere sooner to ensure all parties abide by the
agreement.
Force or Direct: A team manager agrees with one party’s viewpoint and enforces
their wishes. This is a win-lose situation and risks demoralising the team.
This conflict-resolution technique can be used in the following cases:
- When a team
manager needs a quick solution.
- Where it
is easy to define when one party is correct, and the other is incorrect.
- When the
stakeholders on the conflict's losing side are unimportant.
- If the relationship
with those stakeholders is not essential.
This technique provides a quick solution
to the problem. It requires almost no effort from the team manager and may help
establish the team manager’s authority. Using this technique may cause a
negative impression on the team manager. It may lose them opportunities gained
from the opposing party's viewpoint. A team manager must refrain from applying
this technique with high-power stakeholders as sometimes it may backfire and
worsen the conflict.
Collaborate or Problem Solve: In this technique, a team manager discusses the issue with all
parties to agree on a solution while considering multiple viewpoints. The team manager
may use this technique in the following cases:
- When a team
manager wants to incorporate multiple views.
- If the
people involved in the conflict are influential.
- When a
consensus is required.
- If the team manager
wants to distribute responsibility equally to all parties.
This fundamental problem-solving
technique gives a final solution to the conflict. It brings consensus, commitment,
and shared responsibility for the outcome. This technique creates a win-win
situation as it builds confidence in the team, earns respect, and establishes
authority.
A team manager cannot use this technique with
all conflicts when they need a quick solution because it takes time and effort.
It is generally used for disputes which may severely affect an organisation.
Conflicts exist throughout an
organisation as people battle to find solutions to arguments, disputes, or
differences of opinion. They can occur as people struggle to find their place
within a team, for political reasons or because of a genuine difference of
opinion based on their knowledge surrounding the dispute at the time it occurs.
People who are involved in disputes
become fixated on winning the battle, come what may, leading to wasted time and
effort that could be more effectively utilised on the aims and objectives of
the organisation. Dispute resolution skills can be utilised to great effect to
reduce this impact on organisational cohesiveness.
How and when differences of opinion are
settled affects the morale of the rest of the organisation as well as the
reputation of the team manager within whose area the dispute occurs. The key is
to settle the dispute as quickly as possible to the satisfaction of all
concerned to prevent it from affecting organisational efficiency and
effectiveness.
Additional articles can be found at Procurement Made Easy. This site looks at procurement issues to assist organisations and people in increasing the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their product and service supply to the customers' delight. ©️ Procurement Made Easy. All rights reserved.