The idea of "public value" has
emerged as a key factor for government agencies, local authorities, and public
sector buyers in evaluating the objectives and effectiveness of their
purchasing. In contrast to conventional private-sector definitions of value,
which emphasise profitability or return on investment, public value encompasses
a broader range of objectives. While it includes economic efficiency, it also
integrates social results, trust, legitimacy, community satisfaction, and
longer-term effects.
From Value for Money to Broader Outcomes
Public value encompasses more than just
the financial cost of goods or services, which is typically assessed through
the lens of value for money. It also considers the overall benefits that public
spending and actions bring to society. The concept was popularised by scholars
like Mark H. Moore, who likened public value to shareholder value in the
private sector. Private sector companies are evaluated based on their ability
to provide returns to shareholders, but public organisations are assessed on
their capacity to generate value for the community.
This perspective has increasingly shaped
government performance evaluation and procurement, policy-making, and
service delivery approaches in the UK. Historically, the UK public sector has operated
under the value for money (VFM) principle, especially in procurement processes.
VFM is typically interpreted as achieving the optimal balance of quality and
cost to fulfil specific needs. It has been fundamental to audit and
accountability practices, particularly influenced by the National Audit Office
and the Treasury’s Green Book, which outlines the framework for developing
business cases.
However, while this approach is
significant, it has its drawbacks. It often emphasises immediate financial
results and may overlook broader societal and long-term advantages that are
more challenging to measure. Acknowledging these limitations, the concept of
public value offers a broader perspective. It accommodates indirect benefits
and social improvements that may not be evident in short-term financial
assessments.
For example, a procurement choice that
incurs higher initial costs but leads to improved health outcomes,
environmental sustainability, or enhanced community cohesion may provide
greater public value over time than a less expensive option. This evolution
signifies a more profound recognition of the government's role, which extends
beyond mere efficient spending to delivering substantial and lasting benefits
to the public.
Measuring the Intangible in Public Value
and Policy Design
A significant challenge in realising the
concept of public value lies in its measurement. While quantifying cost savings
or output levels is straightforward, public value encompasses various
dimensions that traditional metrics fail to capture. These dimensions may
include enhanced trust in public institutions, greater social inclusion,
improved mental health outcomes, and decreased crime rates, factors that
significantly affect quality of life and governmental legitimacy but are
challenging to quantify numerically.
The UK has adopted more advanced
evaluation methods, integrating quantitative and qualitative data to tackle
this issue. Approaches such as social return on investment, a cost-benefit
analysis that includes non-monetised benefits, and outcomes-based commissioning
exemplify efforts to encompass the full range of value derived from public
expenditure. The Public Value Framework, created by Sir Michael Barber and
embraced by HM Treasury, aims to assist local authorities in evaluating
performance more comprehensively. It encourages public entities to consider the
costs and outputs of services and the quality of outcomes, user satisfaction,
and overall legitimacy.
Moreover, public value plays a crucial
role in shaping the design and implementation of policies. It serves as a
framework for assessing whether a policy benefits society significantly,
extending beyond mere efficiency or compliance. For example, when formulating
education policy, public value would promote a focus not just on exam scores or
graduation rates, but also on equity, access, student well-being, and long-term
opportunities. In the healthcare sector, public value would encompass treatment
expenses and waiting times, preventive care, mental health services, and the
overall patient experience.
This comprehensive strategy is reflected
in policies incorporating social and environmental factors into
decision-making. The Social Value Act of 2012 represented a significant shift,
mandating that public authorities evaluate how the services they procure can
enhance their communities' economic, social, and environmental health. This
legal requirement has prompted public entities to expand their focus beyond
mere contractual obligations, encouraging them to consider how their purchasing
decisions can yield broader societal advantages, including job creation, lower
carbon emissions, and promoting equality.
Accountability, Innovation and Long-Term
Thinking
Public value is intricately linked to
legitimacy and democratic accountability. In a representative democracy such as
the UK, it is essential for governments to not only function effectively but
also to be perceived as acting in the public's best interest. The Public
demands transparency, fairness, and responsiveness from their public
institutions. Consequently, a significant portion of the value generated by
public organisations is determined by their conduct, including their
inclusivity, willingness to listen to the public, and adherence to ethical
standards.
This aspect of public value underscores
the critical role of public engagement and trust. Public value is compromised
if services are efficient yet perceived as unfair, inaccessible, or
unresponsive. For instance, a local council might provide waste collection
services at a low cost. However, the perceived public value diminishes if
residents feel excluded from decision-making or believe the system favours
specific neighbourhoods. This insight emphasises the necessity for
participatory governance, transparency, and responsiveness as fundamental to
public value creation.
A vital element of public value is the
focus on innovation and long-term impact. Conventional public management
strategies prioritising short-term goals and budget cycles often fail to
promote innovation or embrace risk-taking. In contrast, public value thinking
advocates for a more progressive approach. It acknowledges that addressing
complex social issues, such as homelessness, climate change, or health
disparities, necessitates long-term investment, collaboration across sectors,
and a willingness to experiment. While these initiatives may not provide
immediate benefits, they can generate significant public value over time.
This perspective has led to innovative
public service delivery models prioritising prevention over reaction. For
instance, while early intervention initiatives in health or social care may
require higher initial funding, they can alleviate the burden on emergency
services and enhance long-term outcomes. Likewise, although investing in green
infrastructure may not yield immediate financial benefits, it fosters
sustainability and resilience. The concept of public value legitimises these
approaches by presenting them as essential and justified investments in the
common good.
Challenges and Criticisms of Defining
Public Value
The public value framework, while
attractive, faces several challenges. A prevalent critique is that the concept
lacks clarity and can be overly subjective. Its broad range of outcomes and
viewpoints makes it challenging to apply consistently or to use as a foundation
for accountability. Additionally, there is a concern that public value may be
politicised, potentially serving as a rhetorical device to justify contentious
decisions or obscure inefficiencies.
In response to these issues, the UK
public sector has aimed to establish clearer standards and methodologies for
assessing public value. Instruments like the Green Book (guidance issued by HM
Treasury on appraising policies, programmes, and projects) now
consider broader social impacts, and organisations such as the Office for
National Statistics are working on quantifying wellbeing and social capital.
However, conflicts persist between differing values, such as efficiency versus
equity, speed versus inclusion, and central control versus local
responsiveness.
Balancing these priorities necessitates
careful judgment, political leadership, and continuous public discourse. In the
UK, public value signifies a departure from a limited, transactional mindset in
the public sector towards a more comprehensive and nuanced perspective on the
role of government and its operations. Although value for money remains a key
consideration, it is no longer viewed as adequate on its own. The objective is
to reduce spending and invest wisely, fostering genuine and enduring societal
benefits.
This comprehensive perspective
encompasses indirect and non-financial results, ranging from enhanced
well-being to more cohesive communities and increased trust in institutions. It
necessitates innovative measurement methods, more inclusive governance practices,
and a long-term vision for public service. Although the concept can be
intricate and occasionally debated, it presents an essential framework for
comprehending how public institutions can secure their role in society, not
solely through efficiency but also through legitimacy, responsiveness, and
meaningful impact.
Thus, public value transcends mere
managerial terminology; it embodies a democratic principle. It captures the
public's shifting expectations. It acknowledges the importance of public
services in addressing the needs of people and communities rather than just
focusing on markets or metrics. As the UK faces ongoing social, economic, and
environmental challenges, public value is a foundational principle for
fostering a more equitable, resilient, and accountable public sector.
Defining Social Value
In the UK, social value pertains to the
broader non-financial consequences of decisions, especially those associated
with public sector purchasing, business practices, and community enhancement.
It emphasises the contributions of various activities to the enduring welfare
of individuals, communities, and society. While it includes economic
advantages, social value extends beyond profit to encompass environmental
sustainability, health, education, equality, and community resilience. This
concept has progressed from an ambiguous ethical goal to a quantifiable and
increasingly enforceable element in public and private sector decision-making.
A significant milestone in establishing
social value was the enactment of the Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012.
This legislation mandates that public authorities in England and Wales consider
how the services they commission and procure can enhance economic, social, and
environmental well-being. This shift in procurement policy encourages public
entities to look beyond mere cost-effectiveness and consider the long-term
social implications of their purchasing. Consequently, organisations vying for
public contracts must illustrate how they will provide value that transcends
the immediate service offered.
However, the definition of social value
is not universally applicable; it varies based on local circumstances, the
stakeholders involved, and the specific nature of the project. For example, a
local authority in an economically disadvantaged urban area may define social
value regarding job creation and youth engagement. At the same time, a rural
council might focus on environmental conservation and transportation
accessibility. This adaptable nature of social value presents opportunities and
challenges: it enables tailored local solutions but can also result in varying
standards and complications in assessment.
Measuring Social Value
Measurement continues to be a highly
debated element of social value. In contrast to conventional financial metrics,
social value encompasses intangible results such as enhanced mental well-being,
fortified community connections, and diminished feelings of isolation. Various
frameworks have been developed to assist in quantifying these outcomes,
including the Social Return on Investment model and the National TOMs (Themes,
Outcomes, Measures) Framework created by the Social Value Portal.
These instruments aim to assign monetary
values to social benefits, allowing organisations to evaluate and compare
results across different projects and sectors. However, some critics contend
that this approach may oversimplify intricate social challenges or prioritise
outcomes that are easier to measure. Integrating social value into procurement
and corporate responsibility strategies is on the rise. For businesses in the
UK, particularly those vying for public contracts, demonstrating a strong
commitment to social value has become essential for maintaining a competitive
edge.
This transition has catalysed innovation
and encouraged partnerships with voluntary and community organisations,
particularly in skills enhancement, carbon footprint reduction, and social
inclusion. An example might include suppliers that offer apprenticeships to the
local community or adopt sustainable materials as part of their commitment to
social responsibility and strategic initiatives that align with a wider social
value framework. In 2021, the UK government expanded the Social Value Act by
implementing the Social Value Model, a framework designed to assist public
sector buyers in determining which inquiries to make to distinguish suppliers
based on their societal impact.
This model establishes standardised
focus areas, including combating climate change, aiding COVID-19 recovery, and
addressing economic inequality. It offers a more structured approach for public
entities to evaluate proposals and encourages uniformity in how social value is
incorporated into procurement processes. While the model does not eliminate the
need for local interpretation, it provides a more robust framework for
comparison and accountability in assessing social value initiatives.
Despite the progress made, discussions
persist regarding the boundaries of social value. Critics caution that without
authentic engagement and a focus on long-term outcomes, it may devolve into a
mere exercise in compliance. Additionally, there are concerns about 'social
washing,' where organisations make inflated claims about their impact without
delivering substantial results. In response to these issues, many stakeholders
advocate for enhanced regulations, improved data sharing, and more thorough monitoring
of results. The public, private, and third sectors must collaborate
transparently to ensure that social value initiatives align with community
needs.
The concept of social value in the UK
signifies an increasing awareness that the effectiveness of services and
projects should not be evaluated solely on their financial cost. It emphasises
assessing whether initiatives genuinely enhance lives and fortify communities.
As challenges such as inequality, climate change, and social disintegration
persist, the demand for integrating social value into core decision-making
processes is expected to intensify. The clarity with which social value is
defined, measured, and implemented will be pivotal in determining whether it
evolves into a transformative influence or becomes another fleeting policy
trend.
The Difference Between Public and Social
Value
The notions of public value and social
value are interconnected yet distinct. Both concepts focus on outcomes that
benefit society, but they arise from different frameworks, fulfil differing
roles, and are evaluated through various methods. Recognising these
distinctions is crucial for policymakers, public service providers, and
organisations functioning in both the public and third sectors. Public value
pertains to the worth generated by government and public institutions through
their actions, policies, and services. It includes the objectives that the
public sector seeks to accomplish for the public, such as safety, health,
education, equity, and democratic accountability.
The term gained traction in the UK
thanks to Mark H. Moore's contributions and has since influenced public
management theory and practice. Public value emphasises the legitimacy and
backing of government initiatives, the effectiveness of service delivery, and
the alignment of public services with the public's expectations. It is a
comprehensive framework for evaluating how public organisations contribute to
the common good, considering quantifiable outputs, trust, fairness, and
community engagement.
Conversely, social value in the UK is
defined within a more specific legal and policy framework. It was established
through the Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012, which mandates that public
sector organisations and buyers assess how the services they procure can
enhance their local communities' economic, social, and environmental
well-being. Social value is often linked to the outcomes of third-sector
organisations, social enterprises, and private sector companies executing
public contracts.
Social value is frequently assessed
through instruments such as the Social Return on Investment and is associated
with procurement strategies, community benefit clauses, and corporate social
responsibility efforts. It highlights the additional advantages that extend
beyond the main objectives of a service or contract, including the creation of
local jobs, the development of skills, community involvement, and the promotion
of environmental sustainability.
The Contexts of Public and Social Value
The fundamental distinction between the
two concepts lies in their origins and scope. Public value is a more expansive
and abstract idea, deeply rooted in public administration and political theory.
It encompasses the overall contribution of public services to society,
including intangible aspects such as public trust and civic engagement. This
concept focuses on how public institutions validate their existence and actions
to the public they serve. In contrast, social value is more practical and tied
to specific policy tools. It emphasises the additional benefits of
commissioning and contracting, often within a competitive market context.
Another notable difference is in their
evaluation methods. Public value is typically assessed using qualitative and
comprehensive approaches, such as public surveys, democratic feedback, and
long-term policy impacts. It prioritises legitimacy and public satisfaction
over financial metrics. Conversely, social value is measured through
quantifiable indicators that illustrate the effect of investment. This approach
often employs frameworks that assign monetary values to non-financial outcomes,
making it easier to compare and justify decisions in procurement.
Despite their differences, the two
concepts are interconnected. Initiatives aimed at social value can enhance
public value when they align with broader societal objectives and bolster the
legitimacy of public services. For instance, a local authority that contracts
with social enterprises provides services and promotes inclusive employment,
community cohesion, and environmental sustainability, thereby enhancing public
value.
However, focusing exclusively on social
value without considering the broader implications of public value may lead to
fragmented services and weaken democratic accountability. In the UK context,
public and social values play crucial roles in developing an effective, fair,
and responsive public sector. Understanding the differences between these
concepts aids in defining roles and responsibilities, prevents conceptual
misunderstandings, and ensures that procurement practices and public management
strategies align to benefit the public good.
Additional
articles can be found at Procurement Made Easy. This site looks at procurement
issues to assist organisations and people in increasing the quality,
efficiency, and effectiveness of their product and service supply to the
customers' delight. ©️ Procurement Made Easy. All rights reserved.
